Back in 2000 when I worked for a code static analysis company, I had never heard of "peer code review." People always discussed "Inspections" (meetings with reams of paper pouring over code), or using a static analysis tool for catching typical programming errors while writing code.

Are you performing some type of human-based "inspections" on your code base?

And if you are doing it, are you doing it as part of additional defect finding processes? Manually? With a tool?

I do or use:

1. Inspections (non-tool)
2. static analysis tool
3. automated testing tool
4. tool-assisted peer code review

What challenges do you run up against in doing any or all of these practices?

Thank you,

Alex